|
|
|
I have just reread this.
If you owned the whole unit and looked aftert
the rentals and youo lived in half, beause of the Fedel Sacamona (sp) case,
there would not be any tax on sale if you did not depreciate the property while
renting it out.
Under the circumstances, I
would assume that the building will be in both names. If so, your side
is your prinipal residence and your father's side is a rental. In this
case, if the building goes up in value, any profit is free of capital gains
tax.
Your father can write off his share of the interest,
taxes, repairs and maintenance, advertising, etc. When you sell the
building, your father would be taxable on his half.
If your father were to loan you the money and you
owned the whole rental, he could not write off anything and must report an
imputed amount of interest from you even if he decided not to charge you
interest.
In this case, any write-offs for tax purposes would
likely be yours.
.
Could it be considered a primary
residence if I live there but he doesn't?
As above, it is a
primary residence for you, not your father.
Subsequently, could he write it off as an investment? If not, how could he make this a tax advantage without putting 25% down?
If you are living in
it, he can only write off one-half of the expenses. Any expenses he paid
that could be considered to be for your benefit, are NOT deductible for him.
I would also like to know what your forecast for Kamloops is?
I will let Ozzie give
you his forecast.
Thank you SXXXX > > Ozzie Jurock |
|
|