Back to E-mail Index
 
 
 
In my tax case I had to patiently explain CCA (depreciation) to Judge Mogan, a Judge specifically appointed to the Tax Court of Canada.
 
It was no wonder that he then found against me in a million dollar matter.  He absolutely did not understand the law, let alone the principal.  Of course, even the two auditors from Revenue Canada disagreed.
 
The problem is that "JUSTICE" costs too much.
 
Funding Multi million dollar trials like Air India and the Picton Pig Farm takes so muich out of the system, there is nothing left for the other "little" people who need it.
 
Look at Peter Ritchie and the Pig Farm Defence.  He wants a six lawyer team for the defence and he wants it now.
 
Compare this to the system in Seattle where the Green River trial has two or three lawyers and the public defenders income is capped at $72,000 per year with some getting $50,000 or so.  US dollars to be sure but it is interesting that they don't buy much more.
 
I am told by my clients that if you earn $100,000 Canadian in Vancouver, you need $110,000 American to have the same life style in San Francisco for instance and $125,000 US to have the same life style in San Jose.
 
Because Washington has no State Income Tax, $72.000 US is likely the same lifestyle as $72,000 Canadian.
 
Of course foxy 1 started this thread with the concept of social position.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am always reminded in these matters of the First Jewish person to become President of the United States.  Not only that, this person was a Lady Jewish President of the United States and no, it was not Madelaine Albright.
 
Anyway, the election is over and the new Jewish President Elect phones her mother in Des Moines, Iowa and tells her that she has won the election.
 
Mother says something like So!
 
The president elect invites her mother to the inaugral ball but mother says she can't go because it will cost too much and she doesn;t have anything to wear.
 
The president elect says she will send Air Force One to pick her up and arranges for a Givenchy Gown for her mother.
 
The ceremony is now taking place and mother is sitting in the front row next to a US Senator as her daughter is being sworn in as the 65th President of the United States.
 
Mother leans over to the Senator and says,  "see that lady up there, her sister is married to a doctor."
 
Enough said!
 
One of my friends has a niece who is marrying Dr Phil, Oprah's psychologist guru.  Now that is bragging rights!
 
david ingram - www.centa.com
108-100 Park Royal South
West Vancouver, BC, CANADA, V7T 1A2
(604) 913-9133 - Fax (604) 913-9123
cell (604) 657-8451 (10 AM to 10 PM 7 days)
US / CANADA Income Tax and Working Visa Matters
----- Original Message -----
From:
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: [INGRAM] JUDGEMENT

I think that's part of what is wrong in our society, this nonsense social strata thing. I once worked doing the books for a legal firm and went head to head with one of the partners who is now a judge, on a matter of employment standards. I was right. He nearly had an apoplectic fit, the silly man.

Reminds me of my mother, who had great difficulty in deciding whether doctors or priests should take precedence in her idea of the social heirarchy. When I married a GP's son and my uncle who was a canon came to the wedding, she nearly had a fit herself deciding who should be introduced to whom.

I have no time for any of it. It's used to cover up a multitude of sins and we'd all be better off without it.

Jes' my opine..

FL

At 05:22 PM 11/1/02 -0800, you wrote:

You raise a good point...
 
I have known many lawyers who have become judges.  David has as well.  There is a change that does happen, a subtle change in character.  I remember that from an early age when an uncle of mine was elevated to the Bench.  The next family party, I noticed the other lawyers in the family carefully using his new honorific.  I thought at first they were doing so in jest.  Nope!  They continued to use it, almost all the time.  And, in that case, the uncle expected it...
 
Part of that comes from the imposed isolation.  Part from the power - few can control a room like a judge in full fury.  I remember being in court when one judge took his first day at divorce court.  He had been a prosecutor and had no divorce knowledge.  I watched in horror as he tore into a senior lawyer presenting a divorce.  It was a horrible display but the lawyer, very experienced in divorce matters, had to stand there and take it, like a child.  I was very glad that day to have a terrible cold, giving me a harsh voice and some sympathy.  Another judge threatened to throw me in jail for contempt when I tried to point out to him that there were two statutes governing rental arrangements - the residential one and the commercial one (at that time, the names were a bit confusing).  He never did admit he was wrong; he simply cut the amount demanded in two and left the courtroom.  A lousy (and cowardly) decision.
 
Hugs,
willow   
 
 








Copyright  © 1996-2008 david Ingram
All rights Reserved