RRSP for US resident - keep it or cash it in. Who to

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
RE: Paying client - RESEND - RSP questionsYou are correct.
However, this particular writer is not in the USA temporarily.
He is a full time resident.
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 2:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:  RRSP for US resident - keep it or cash
it in. Who to use when living in the USA - Shaun Rickerby TD
Waterhouse -
David,
It is my understanding that a Canadian Registered Rep can manage
an RRSP for a U.S. Resident if a previous relationship existed
(in Canada) + the U.S. Resident lives in a "Self-Executing
Exemption" State + the resident is in the US temporarily (i.e. a
TN visa or snowbird).  Is this correct?
Thanks,
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:08 AM
To: CENTAPEDE
Subject:  RRSP for US resident - keep it or cash it
in. Who to use when living in the USA - Shaun Rickerby TD
Waterhouse -
      Hi David,
      Good talking to you the other day.  The questions I had
sent on a couple of previous occasions follow:
      I have two RSPs, one w/ RBC and one w/ CIBC. Both currently
have my 'Canadian' (i.e. my mom's) address.  I want to change
them to my U.S. address, and RBC told me that offshore RSP
holders can't transact in their RSPs other than to sell holdings.
I'm fine with that.
      This is not true if you have it with the right broker.
Shaun Rickerby is the manager of a TD Waterhouse branch in
Kerrisdale in Vancouver.  His phone number is (604) 482-5188 and
his email is
       [email protected] or [email protected]
      The CIBC RSP, however, is worth less than $5,000, and I was
thinking of closing it and transferring the holdings in kind, or
the cash equivalent, to my RBC RSP.  Presumably I should do that
prior to putting through my address change.  Given my being down
here in the U.S., with my RSP reporting requirements, what do you
think:
      1] Is it "better" to just leave it as is; i.e. will a
closure and transfer make for unnecessarily convoluted 2004 tax
returns?
      move both accounts to Shaun and deal with someone who
"wants" to deal with US residents and has licenced himself to do
so. The problem is that no one at the CIBC that I know of (there
may be someone and they should contact me if there is) has
licenced themselves to deal in the USA as Shaun has.
      2] Would your fee thus be higher for me next year?
       Whether you close it or move it, the paperwork has to be
done. Likely slightly higher unless it all fits into two hours
anyway.
      3] If I closed it and didn't transfer it to my other RSP
and simply pulled the cash out and paid tax on it, would that
also make for a convoluted (and expensive) 2004 tax season, i.e.
would that be "worth" it?
      same as (2) above. We have your old names in the system.
Therefore, we have less to do than last year.  If you change it,
we have to put more in.  However, you cannot or should not leave
them where they are under the circumstances.
      4] In one (or more) of your emails to those of us on your
distribution list, did you mention that you can make a case for
U.S. residents to simply dissolve their RRSPs?  Can further info
be found @ centa.com?
      I can make an argument for anyone to cash in their RRSP's
but it is an individual decision that involves deciding whether
you want the government or a bank as your partner.
      For instance, in any ten year period I know of, you would
be better off today, borrowing $100,000 for an investment that
increases in value whether it is Real Estate or a good mutual
fund and then withdrawing enough out of an existing RRSP to pay
the expenses.
      This gets the money "out" of the RRSP and into your own
hands.
      Manulife has a fantastic Seg Fund system where they will
loan you $50,000 to invest, guarantee the principal at 10 years
and at a 4 % return, it is equal to an RRSP with thge same
investment.  At 8%, return which is less than the last ten years,
the leveraged investment should double the return of an RRSP with
the same amount of money going in.
      Thanks as always,
      A XXXXXXX
      ----------
      Answers to this and other similar  questions can be
obtained free on Air every Sunday morning.
      Starting this Sunday at 9:00 AM on 600AM in Vancouver, Fred
Snyder of Cartier Partners and I, David Ingram  will be hosting
an INFOMERCIAL but LIVE talk show called "ITS YOUR MONEY"
      Those outside of the Lower Mainland will be able to listen
on the internet at
      www.600AM.com
      David Ingram's US/Canada Services
      US / Canada / Mexico tax, Immigration and working Visa
Specialists
      US / Canada Real Estate Specialists
      4466 Prospect Road
      North Vancouver,  BC, CANADA, V7N 3L7
      Res (604) 980-3578 Cell (604) 657-8451
      (604) 980-0321
      New email to [email protected]
      www.centa.com www.david-ingram.com
      Disclaimer:  This question has been answered without
detailed information or consultation and is to be regarded only
as general comment.   Nothing in this message is or should be
construed as advice in any particular circumstances. No contract
exists between the reader and the author and any and all
non-contractual duties are expressly denied. All readers should
obtain formal advice from a competent and appropriately qualified
legal practitioner or tax specialist in connection with personal
or business affairs such as at www.centa.com. If you forward this
message, this disclaimer must be included."
      Be ALERT,  the world needs more "lerts"
      Alaska,  Alabama,  Arkansas,  Arizona,
      California,  Colorado, Connecticut,
      Delaware, District of Columbia,  Florida,
      Garland, Georgia,  Hawaii,  Idaho,  Illinois,
      Indiana,  Iowa,  Kansas,  Kentucky,
      Louisiana,  Maine,  Maryland,
      Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota,
      Mississippi,  Missouri,  Montana,  Nebraska,
      Nevada, New Hampshire,  New Jersey,
      New Mexico,New York, North Carolina,
      North Dakota,  Ohio,  Oklahoma,  Oregon.
      Pennsylvania,  Rhode Island,  Rockwall,
      South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee,
      Texas,  Utah, Vermont,  Virginia,
      West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming,
      British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan,
      Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec City,
      New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island,
      Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, Yukon and
      Northwest and Nunavit Territories,
      Mount Vernon, Eumenclaw, Coos Bay
      and Dallas Houston Rockwall Garland
      Texas  Taxman and Tax Guru  and wizzard
      wizard - consultant - expert - advisor -advisors
consultants - gurus - Paris Prague Moscow Berlin
      Lima Rio de Janeiro, Santaigo
      This from "ask an income tax and immigration expert" from
www.centa.com or www.jurock.com or www.featureweb.com. David
Ingram deals on a daily basis with expatriate tax returns with:
      multi jurisdictional cross and trans border expatriate
problems  for the United States, Canada, Mexico, Great Britain,
the United Kingdom, Kuwait, Dubai, Saudi Arabia, Thailand,
Indonesia, Japan, China, New Zealand, France, Germany, Spain,
Italy, Russia, Georgia, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, Scotland,
Ireland, Hawaii, Florida, Montana, Morocco, Israel, Iraq, Iran,
India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Mali, Bangkok, Greenland, Iceland,
Cuba, Bahamas, Bermuda, Barbados, St Vincent, Grenada,, Virgin
Islands, US, UK, GB, and any of the 43 states with state tax
returns, etc. Rockwall, Dallas, San Antonio and Houston Texas
      Denmark, Finland, Sweden Norway Bulgaria Croatia Income Tax
and Immigration Tips, Income Tax and ImmigrationWizard Income Tax
and Immigration Guru Income Tax and Immigration Consultant Income
Tax  and Immigration Specialist Section 216(4) 216(1) NR6 NR-6 NR
6 Non-Resident Real Estate tax specialist expert preparer
consultant expatriate anti money laundering money seasoning
FINTRAC E677 E667 4789 4790 TDF-90 Reporting $10,000 cross border
transactions
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information
by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and
may be illegal. CIBC World Markets Inc. reserves the right to
monitor all e-mail communications through its networks for
quality control purposes. If you wish to stop receiving
communication from us via e-mail, please respond to this message
with the word 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
No trading instructions will be accepted by e-mail.
Ce message électronique et les fichiers qui y sont joints peuvent
contenir des renseignements confidentiels. Si vous n’êtes pas le
destinataire visé, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur
en répondant à ce message; effacez ensuite le message et
détruisez toute copie. La diffusion ou l’usage de ces
renseignements par une personne autre que le destinataire visé n’
est pas autorisé et peut constituer un acte illégal. Marchés
mondiaux CIBC inc. se réserve le droit de surveiller toutes les
communications transmises par courrier électronique par l’
intermédiaire de ses réseaux à des fins de contrôle de la
qualité. Si vous souhaitez ne plus recevoir de communications de
notre part par courrier électronique, veuillez répondre au
présent message en indiquant « désabonner » dans la ligne de l’
objet.
Les instructions relatives à des opérations acheminées par
courrier électronique ne seront pas acceptées.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.708 / Virus Database: 464 - Release Date: 6/18/04
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.centa.com/CEN-TAPEDE/centapede/attachments/bf6b38fb/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://www.centa.com/trackback.php/UsCaWeekofMon20040621001217.html

No trackback comments for this entry.

0 comments